<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is UGC exactly?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dradv.nl/wp/2007/09/05/what-is-ugc-exactly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dradv.nl/wp/en/2007/09/05/what-is-ugc-exactly/</link>
	<description>Direct Response Advertising</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jos</title>
		<link>http://www.dradv.nl/wp/en/2007/09/05/what-is-ugc-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>Jos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 22:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dradv.nl/wp/2007/09/05/what-is-ugc-exactly/#comment-436</guid>
		<description>Dag Wim, ik weet niet of je dit al had gezien?

http://www.edwords.nl/2007/04/02/wat-is-een-business-model-voor-user-generated-content/

Groet, Jos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dag Wim, ik weet niet of je dit al had gezien?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.edwords.nl/2007/04/02/wat-is-een-business-model-voor-user-generated-content/" rel="nofollow">http://www.edwords.nl/2007/04/02/wat-is-een-business-model-voor-user-generated-content/</a></p>
<p>Groet, Jos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jos</title>
		<link>http://www.dradv.nl/wp/en/2007/09/05/what-is-ugc-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Jos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dradv.nl/wp/2007/09/05/what-is-ugc-exactly/#comment-421</guid>
		<description>Hi Wim,

The reason why the discussion on Adfoblog sort of &quot;died&quot; before it really got going, is maybe that I found my analysis and even more my intention to &#039;matrix out&#039; different types or categories of UGC, were somehow hard to follow. Someone even brought up &#039;the bible&#039; as an example of UGC. Great! And true, maybe. But it made me wonder if anyone could see what I was trying to do, and I started doubting myself (&quot;Am I the only one here that sees the relevance of a distinction between different types of UGC?&quot;)

I wanted to create some sort of theoretical matrix about UGC, in order to help the general discussion on the matter make some steps ahead. 

I did this, not only to be able to separate the crap from the core, or better the hype from the hope, I was also searching for a system that the different categories of UGC could be described in, to hopefully arrive at something that would make the really successful UGC campaigns &quot;reproducible&quot; marketing tools.

If we all just continue to talk about UGC and everybody has his own &#039;melting pot&#039; notion of it, then that would be impossible anyway, right?

I am glad you did see my point. Let&#039;s give this some more thought, maybe together in the format of a discussion about the subject? I must admit I am kind of busy right now, but I&#039;ll restart my thinking about it.

Thanks for your mention, and thanks for visiting Marketingâ€¢Review. Talk to you later.
-Jos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Wim,</p>
<p>The reason why the discussion on Adfoblog sort of &#8220;died&#8221; before it really got going, is maybe that I found my analysis and even more my intention to &#8216;matrix out&#8217; different types or categories of UGC, were somehow hard to follow. Someone even brought up &#8216;the bible&#8217; as an example of UGC. Great! And true, maybe. But it made me wonder if anyone could see what I was trying to do, and I started doubting myself (&#8220;Am I the only one here that sees the relevance of a distinction between different types of UGC?&#8221;)</p>
<p>I wanted to create some sort of theoretical matrix about UGC, in order to help the general discussion on the matter make some steps ahead. </p>
<p>I did this, not only to be able to separate the crap from the core, or better the hype from the hope, I was also searching for a system that the different categories of UGC could be described in, to hopefully arrive at something that would make the really successful UGC campaigns &#8220;reproducible&#8221; marketing tools.</p>
<p>If we all just continue to talk about UGC and everybody has his own &#8216;melting pot&#8217; notion of it, then that would be impossible anyway, right?</p>
<p>I am glad you did see my point. Let&#8217;s give this some more thought, maybe together in the format of a discussion about the subject? I must admit I am kind of busy right now, but I&#8217;ll restart my thinking about it.</p>
<p>Thanks for your mention, and thanks for visiting Marketingâ€¢Review. Talk to you later.<br />
-Jos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

